When I asked a teacher about the promise of a 3 percent raise from Gov. Nathan Deal in his state of the state speech, she described it as a “bribe” so she and her colleagues would be mollified and accept his push for merit pay.
Not happening, she said. The raise is long overdue and teachers will be grateful, she said, but they were not going to stop fighting the governor on linking student scores on the yet unproven Milestones tests to influence and set teacher pay.
While avoiding any specific mention of his controversial performance pay idea — even the Republican House Speaker has come out against it– Deal referenced his intentions to consider using student performance to evaluate teachers. He said:
As we continue to discuss the recommendations of the Education Reform Commission, it is important for teachers and administrators to know that just because we are examining ways to more appropriately allocate taxpayer dollars and put in place different models to achieve better education results, it does not mean that you are not appreciated. Just as a sailor should not be insulted when someone repairs a leak in his boat and replaces his oars with a motor, neither should our teachers take offense when we try to do the metaphorical equivalent for them.
I fully understand that there are many factors that impact test scores and graduation rates, and many of these are not within the control of our teachers. A good parent that is dedicated to seeing his or her child succeed in school is the best ally a teacher can have.
My AJC colleague James Salzer has a front page story today on the 3 percent teacher raise that Deal has included in his budget proposal:
Deal used the annual address to talk about what he’d like to see done in education, but he also promised a more deliberative process before asking lawmakers to approve the changes he wants to make. He detailed little of his spending plan for fiscal 2017 — which begins July 1 — other than to say he would request an additional $300 million for k-12 schools. The teacher pay raises would cost districts $233 million.
“With the additional funding this year, furloughs should be a thing of the past, and teachers should receive that 3 percent pay raise, ” Deal said.
In his address, the governor expressed appreciation for teachers and state employees. But he also said teachers shouldn’t be insulted by some of the changes — such as merit pay for educators — that are being proposed.
Since the Great Recession, employees and teachers have gotten little in the way of state-funded raises. Many saw their pay decline because the state and school districts furloughed staffers, meaning they had to take days off without pay.
While Deal included relatively small amounts of money in agency and district budgets for raises last year, some systems said they used the money to add back school days or eliminate furloughs left over from the recession.